Monday, December 30, 2019

2020 OSCARS: Knives Out (2019) - Keeping Suspense While Dropping Clues

[Quick Summary: When the patriarch dies in a "suicide" and leaves his fortune to his nurse, a canny detective steps in to find the true killer in the family.]

This script is primarily a "how-done-it" which leads to the "who."

It is a fast and excellent read.

I was particularly interested to see that the clues were laid out in flashback with an ADDED layer of the clue dropper's emotional uncertainty.

The audience's experience is similar that of an unreliable narrator: who is right? who can we trust?  It is a great way to keep the suspense alive.

ex. INT. MARTA'S CAR - NIGHT - FLASHBACK

She drives out the guard gate and down the private road.

HARLAN (V.O.): Drive out the gate, then to avoid the security cameras, pull off the road BEORE the carved elephant.

Up ahead - a weathered wood carved elephant statue.

MARTA: Wait...was it before or after?

HARLAN (V.O.): AFTER the carved elephant.

MARTA: No, he said - before? Was it?

HARLAN (V.O.): BEAFTERFORE the carved elephant.

MARTA: Shit...

She yanks the wheel and pulls off BEFORE the statue.

WHAT I'VE LEARNED:  It's not just the clues.  It's the emotional need for answers. Keep them guessing.

Knives Out (2019)
Written and directed by Rian Johnson

* I tend to classify mysteries into two camps:
- "how-done-its" (often before technology was advanced)
- "who-done-it" and/or "why-done-it"

Monday, December 23, 2019

2020 OSCARS: Little Women (2019) - Doing Something Different Isn't Enough in an Adaptation

[Quick Summary: The story of aspiring writer Jo March and her sisters Meg, Amy, and Beth in the 1850s.]

TWO THOUGHTS:

1) STUNNED. My sister is one of the hardest demographics to get into theaters:
- She BALKS at going to the movies.
- She would rather watch tv re-runs of "Say Yes to the Dress" at home because she can multi-task, i.e., short attention span.

However, she is also the best demographic if she likes the film:
- She tells EVERYONE about the film.  You can't pay her to shut up.
- She buys the soundtracks, DVDs for the extras. 

So when she insisted that we must see this film on opening day (Christmas), I was stunned. * **

2) DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT ISN'T ENOUGH IN ADAPTATION.

Making a film just to "do something different" would have been boring and a waste of money.  Audiences want more.  (Or as my sister put it, "well done.")

I think the smartest thing the producers did here was to match the right writer to the material.

Writer/director Greta Gerwig said that this film is about "women, art, and money," and understood that these themes have not gone away for women.

How did Gerwig make this script FEEL like the book even though the structure is different (told in flashback)?

I think it is because she:
a) was well aware of the themes and
b) used the form (flashback) to make a point about it.

In the scenes below, notice the contrast from past (carefree, close family fun) to present (hard work, poor, lonely).

ex. "INT./EXT. MARCH HOUSE. NIGHT. 1861.
...The girls laugh and prance and gossip around the warm fire. He stands apart, loving them all, the whole family...

EXT. MARCH HOUSE. NIGHT. CONTINUOUS.

...but most especially Jo. As Laurie retreats back to his big, lonely house, he looks across the field to Jo, writing alone in the attic, absorbed with her work.

THE PRESENT. EXT./INT. NEW YORK BOARDING HOUSE. NIGHT. 1868.

Jo works with her writing costume on: an antique military jacket. Her writing is like an attack, moving into enemy territory and occupying space. Her hand starts to cramp, she shakes it, stretches it, and then switches hands.

Suddenly she stops - she's heard something. She opens the door, but the hallway is empty. She looks down and sees a book, a very beautiful copy of The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. She opens the cover - inside there is a note:

FRIEDRICH (read to camera): For the writer in the attic: Because you enjoyed the play o much tonight, I wanted you to have this. It will help you study character and paint it with your pen. I would love to read what you're writing, if you'll trust me. I promise honesty and whatever intelligence I can muster. Yours, Friedrich

Jo opens the book and almost greedily she begins to read, reciting the words to herself.

WHAT I'VE LEARNED: I was impressed that Gerwig always knew what point she was making. It shows up in the unity of the script.

Little Women (2019)
by Greta Gerwig
Based on the novel by Louisa May Alcott

*You all want to know, "How do you get THAT demographic into the theater?!"

When I asked her, she replied, "It has to be well done."

Sigh. Not helpful. What makes a film "well done"?! 

**She also mentioned becoming interested after seeing a segment interviewing the director on  her favorite "CBS Sunday Morning."

So I guess knowing the audience you're marketing your film to?

Monday, December 16, 2019

TODAY'S NUGGET: The Falcon and the Snowman (1985) - Criminal With Scruples

[Quick Summary: In 1970s L.A., two childhood friends (a gov't code room clerk and a minor drug pusher) sell classified secrets to the Russians.]

I'd like to paint humans as all good or bad, but it would be boring and untrue.

Humans are a mix of good, bad, and the contradictory.

This is especially apparent in criminals with scruples like the Daulton character. 

He comes from a good home, yet he is a heroin addict.

He loves his family, yet he runs his drug business from his parents' pool house.

He is loyal to his childhood friend Chris, yet will end up blackmailing him.

So why do we even empathize with Daulton?

He does aspire to higher moral ground occasionally, especially concerning Chris.

Note in the scene below:
- Chris and Daulton are in their early 20s.
- Chris has just come back to town.  His first stop is Daulton's family's home.
- They have just sat down to breakfast in the backyard.
- Notice Daulton has Chris' best interests in mind...but it is also self-serving.
- Also notice the shorthand between them that signals a long-standing friendship.

ex. EXT. LEE BACKYARD - DAY

...CHRIS: Changed my mind -- no seminary -- couldn't go through with it, what've you been up to?

DAULTON: What're you talking about?

CHRIS: Give me some cantaloupe.

DAULTON: This is some kind of bad joke.

Chris shakes his head 'no,' and salts cantaloupe.  For one of the few times in Daulton's life, he is speechless. Chris smiles proudly, but Daulton's less-than-thrilled reaction kills it.

CHRIS: Come on, congratulate me, I finally came to my senses.  Took me longer than you but at least I did it.

Daulton forks an egg, stirs it around, doesn't congratulate him, doesn't even want to look at him. This is very weird...Chris expected any reaction other than this one.

CHRIS: What.

DAULTON: Forget it.

CHRIS: What --

DAULTON: What -- how many people can say that their priest and their best friend are the same person?

CHRIS: I don't believe this --

DAULTON: I could go to Confession and tell the truth...yeah, laugh, I was counting on you.

CHRIS: You tried to talk me out of it how many times?

DAULTON: So what, I didn't mean it.

CHRIS: When's the last time you even went to Mass?

DAULTON: I still go on the Holy Days and - that has nothing to do with anything -- you've disappointed me.

They study each other. Daulton eventually stops thinking about himself and what this means to him...

DAULTON: What'd you tell your folks?

CHRIS: They don't know I'm back yet.

DAULTON: That'll be interesting.

CHRIS: This is interesting.

DAULTON (eventually): Are you all right?

CHRIS: I will be.

DAULTON: What can I do?

CHRIS: Get my mind off it by whatever means necessary.

WHAT I'VE LEARNED: The Chris-Daulton scenes are the best parts of this script. 

They are full of trust and comradery, and are a direct contrast to Daulton's solo scenes where he continues to bemoan that he can't trust anyone.

The Falcon and the Snowman (1985)(4th revisions, 11/17/83)
by Steve Zaillian
Based on the book, The Falcon and the Snowman: A True Story of Friendship and Espionage, by Robert Lindsey

Monday, December 9, 2019

TODAY'S NUGGET: Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure (1989) - How To Make Me Care: Flaws + Arcs = Vulnerability

[Quick Summary: When they must complete a history report by tomorrow, 16 y.o. Bill and Ted receive a mysterious time traveling phone booth to help them.]

This was a most excellent adventure to read.

First, the premise is clear: Bill and Ted must present a report on historical figures.

Second, the twist is fun: They actually time traveled to find the historical figures.

But what I liked most was that these characters had real flaws and arcs that were not overshadowed by the flashier bits.

In the scene below:
- Both Bill and Ted are rather irresponsible kids (flaws).
- But because the historical figures are helpless as babies, Bill and Ted change and step up like good 'dads' (arc)

ex. "EXT. PREHISTORIC MARSH - DAY

...TED: Beethoven.  (beat) Beethoven?

Billy the Kid nudges Beethoven, who looks up and raises his hand. Next to him, Sigmund Freud is opening a Pudding Cup. He is about to lick the lid when --

TED (seeing him): Sigmund Freud! Don't lick the lid of the Pudding Cup!

But Freud does anyhow, and winces.

TED: I told you not to. Everyone! Don't lick the lids!

ANOTHER ANGLE

Genghis Khan is elbowing Abraham Lincoln, trying to make more room for himself.

TED: Genghis Khan! Abe Lincoln! That's funny until someone gets hurt!

But Genghis Khan and Lincoln keep horsing around. So Ted calls over toward --

BILL

who is sitting on top of the phone booth, fiddling with the broken antenna.

TED (O.S.): Bill, they won't stop roughhousing.

Bill, the disgruntled "father," sighs and looks over his shoulder --

BILL: Do I have to come over there and make you guys stop?"

WHAT I'VE LEARNED: I find vulnerability hard to write.  Perhaps focusing more on flaws and arcs will get me to the same place.

Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure (1989)(6th draft, 11/24/86 w/revisions)
by Chris Matheson and Ed Solomon

Monday, December 2, 2019

TODAY'S NUGGET: Robocop (1987) - Suspense Scene Built by "Hand Offs"

[Quick Summary: When an injured human cop involuntarily becomes the first half-human, half-robotic cop, he discovers his origins in the corruption of the city.]

BAD NEWS: I did not worry about the protagonist much. Why worry?

I had to wait until about half-way into the script until Robocop's memories of being human begin to surface.

GOOD NEWS:  The action is suspenseful, which every big budget action film needs.

I particularly liked how the writers directed the flow of action and built suspense with each "hand off" in the scene below."*

Note the direct and clean flow of action:

ex. "EXT. GAS STATION

...ROBO: Dead or alive, pal. Either way you're coming with me.

EMIL

has heard these words before. He stares at Robo, staggered by nightmare deja vu.

EMIL: Y-you?

It's all too much. He opens with the MAC-10 and dives or cover behind the gas pumps.  Bullets bounces off Robo's armor and shred the gas pumps. One severs the feed hose and gas sprays out under high pressure.  [Emil --> bullets --> gas pump --> hose --> gas]

THE ATTENDANT

can't believe what he's seeing. Pink gas washes the glass window of the booth. He grabs his books and runs away as fast as he can. [Gas over windows]

EMIL

fires, advancing to his bike. Fountains erupt from gas pumps as he riddles them with bullets. Gas seethes across the pavement, lapping at his shoes.  He panics. [Emil --> bullets --> fountains --> gas to his shoes]

ROBOVISION

Command Graphic: TARGETING.  Behind the ruptured pumps, Emil jumps on his bike, and jams it into gear. The bike slips and broadies on the fuel slicked tarmac. And now we're moving very quickly, racing toward  [Robovision --> Emil slipping on gas]

THE CIGARETTE

It smolders on the ground. Tiny fingers of gasoline race to meet it.  [Cigarette meets gasoline]

EMIL

is terrified. The bike inches foreward as the rear wheel spins furiously, spraying gas. The bike hits dry ground and leaps away. Emil holds on for his life. [Emil spinning wheels]

ROBO

steps on the cigarette just before the gas reaches it. Gas floods the pavement around his feet.  Suddenly,  [Robo puts out cigarette --> gas gushes]

THE SHELL STATION

explodes. Robo is engulfed in flames and Emil, leaning low on the bike, races ahead of the fireball. [Explosion --> Emil escapes on bike]

IN THE FIRE

blackened mechanical legs step through the burning rubble.  [Robo escapes]

ROBOVISION

Command Graphic: TARGETING. Vectors lock on the escaping Emil as we clear the fire, raise our blazing arm and fire.  [Robovision targets Emil's bike]

EMIL'S MOTORCYCLE

flips violently. Emil goes flying."  [Bike flips]

WHAT I'VE LEARNED: I liked this scene because Robocop was vulnerable and had to work around it.  For much of the story, he is rather invincible and it got boring.

Robocop (1987)(4th draft w/revisions, 6/10/86)
by Edward Neumeier & Michael Miner

*Hand off = In track and field, a relay baton is handed off from team member to team member.

perPage: 10, numPages: 8, var firstText ='First'; var lastText ='Last'; var prevText ='« Previous'; var nextText ='Next »'; } expr:href='data:label.url' expr:href='data:label.url + "?&max-results=7"'